Menu
Hastings & St. Leonards on-line community newspaper
politics
00FishingBoats

Hastings fishing beach

Fisheries Bill to be discussed in Parliament today

The Second Reading of the Fisheries Bill is scheduled in the House of Commons today, Wednesday 21 November. Rick Dillon catches up with the Labour Party’s prospective parliamentary candidate, Peter Chowney to see how the Labour Party wants to support the nation’s small boat fishing fleets.

The Labour Party are demanding that we should put our small fishing boats first by calling for more fishing quota to be given to smaller fishing boats after Brexit – to provide a fairer deal for Britain’s hard-pressed fishermen. Help for small fisheries such as Hastings is missing from the Government’s current Fisheries Bill. But Labour amendments this week aim to tip the balance in favour of under 10-metre boat operators.

The Government says it will take back control of British waters, but is silent on the future of our Hastings fleet and the country’s 4,000 other small boats.

Whilst small boats represent 80% of Britain’s fishermen, their catch allocation is paltry: accounting for just 4% of the UK’s total fishing quota. And there is little chance this will increase under Tory plans. In contrast, Labour is demanding that quota be reallocated along social and environmental lines.

‘Help for our local fishery is long overdue’ says Chowney

The initiative was welcomed by Labour’s Peter Chowney, the Labour prospective parliamentary candidate for Hastings & Rye.

“The UK fishing quota is allocated by the Government – and has been deeply unfair over many years, he said. This had resulted in Hastings’ fishermen getting insufficient quota to make a living.

“Even though they fish in an environmentally sustainable way, their tiny share of quota makes them economically unsustainable. This commitment by Labour to increase quota for the smaller boats will help our local fishery to survive, and is long overdue. All we need now is a Labour Government to put it in place.”

For the many …

Labour’s policy is a practical example of Labour’s policy of ’For the Many, Not the Few’.

Across the country, small boats provide the bulk of jobs in the catching sector and contribute to coastal towns from Cornwall to the far north of Scotland, Northern Ireland to Kent. However, nearly a third (29%) of the UK’s fishing quota is owned or controlled by just five families on the Sunday Times Rich List.

The Dutch-owned trawler, the Cornelis Vrolijk, controls more than a fifth of England’s entire quota allocation, while around two-thirds of the UK’s quota is awarded to three multinational companies.

‘Labour will ensure that fishing quota isn’t monopolised by the few’

Luke Pollard MP, Labour’s Shadow Fisheries Minister, said: “By ignoring the needs of smaller fishing fleets, this Government is betraying British fishing.

“Michael Gove could take action to redistribute fishing quota now if he wanted to  – but he is failing by not delivering quota reallocation in the Fisheries Bill.

“Labour is setting out our vision for Britain to have the most sustainable fisheries in the world. That means a greater focus on ensuring fish stocks are healthy, that there is proper enforcement and a fairer distribution of fishing quota.

“Labour will ensure that fishing quota isn’t monopolised by the few. Fishing reform could usher in a huge regeneration of coastal towns but not unless ministers drastically improve the Fisheries Bill.”

Labour in government will set out a strong, credible and fair plan for the future allocation of new and existing quota by giving more fishing opportunities to small fishing boats, based on new social and environmental criteria, he added.

Labour’s Shadow Defra team is also consulting on how to boost employment opportunities in ports and processing, and how to incentivise environmentally sustainable fishing methods.

More information…

  • Smaller boats have just six per cent of the total quota
  • Fishing industry warning over future of small boats before Brexit
  • Five families on the Times Rich List own nearly a third (29%) of the UK’s fishing quota holdings:
    Alexander Buchan and family are ranked 804 in the 2018 Sunday Times Rich List, with an estimated net worth of £147m. The family’s Peterhead-based Lunar Fishing Company owns or controls 8.9% of the UK’s quota holdings (739,153 FQAs), making it the biggest quota holder in the UK.
    Jan Colam and family are ranked 882 on the Rich List (estimated worth: £130m). The Colam family-owned company Interfish is the second largest quota holder, with 7.8% of the UK total (643,927 FQAs)
    Robert Tait and family are ranked 980 on the Rich List (estimated worth: £115m). The family’s Klondyke Fishing Company is the UK’s third-largest quota holder, with 6.1% of the UK total (506,953 FQAs).
    Andrew Marr and family are ranked 567 on the Rich List (estimated worth: £209m). The family’s Hull-based Andrew Marr International owns or controls 5.1% of UK quota holdings (419,937 FQAs), making it the UK’s 5th largest quota holder. It also has minority stakes in companies and vessel partnerships that hold a further 5.4% of UK quota (445,981 FQAS).
    Sir Ian Wood and family are ranked 77 on the Rich List, with an estimated worth of £1.7bn (a fortune built largely on oil and gas services). Sir Ian’s fishing business, JW Holdings, holds 1% of the UK’s fishing quota (83,463 FQAs) and has minority investments in businesses/partnerships that hold a further 2.3% (192,169 FQAs).
    Greenpeace, 10 October 2018

Posted 10:42 Wednesday, Nov 21, 2018 In: Politics

1 Comment


Please read our comment guidelines before posting on HOT
  1. Heather Grief

    This article does not contain the whole picture.

    I would like to know what the last Labour government (mainly under Tony Blair) did to help the UK’s small boats during the years that it was in power, if anything. Perhaps Cllr Chowney would care to tell us.

    This problem has been ongoing ever since Ted Heath and co. were foolish enough to give away most of the quota for fishing in our waters because he was so desperate to get into the so-called ‘Common Market’, actually a highly protectionist and price-supporting organisation at the time.
    I hope someone will be able to find out what the figures were for the original split.
    This is where the big injustice was done. French, Spanish etc. boats have ruined our traditional fishing grounds by their use of too-small nets and taking undersized fish, before they were big enough to breed – yes, I have been on a French fishing boat, in 1970, and seen them landing far too small mackerel.

    What is worse, some of our quota has been sold to foreign-based and -crewed boats. I guess this is pure capitalist greed, and patriotism did not feature in the decision. Also, the UK /EU rules allowed this to happen. Why was this?
    All the UK’s governments from 1973 are to blame here, along with the EU.

    Whenever a country joins, it seems to experience price inflation; someone I know who was living in Cyprus when it joined found her shopping bill went up from £80 to £120. In the case of the UK, inflation was fuelled by VAT, then at a mere 8%.
    The same is likely to be true for leaving. The way in which ‘cheese will go up by 40% when we leave’, and similar figures, are bandied about (usually by vested interests), and not challenged in the media, annoys me.
    Recently, someone from ARLA (a dairy farmers’ co-operative) said to a BBC news/current affairs person on Radio 4, that if we left on World Trade Organisation rules, then 10% would be added to the cost of the 15% of the milk that they import for use in the UK; also, that the average delay for milk tankers would be 7 minutes at the port. Somehow, this transformed into a 40% price rise in milk, yogurts etc. for the consumer. The BBC person did not challenge this mathematical nonsense.
    10% of 15% is a 1.5% additional cost in their total milk cost. Maybe this should be rounded up to 2%, including that short average delay at the port. Probably, the cost of the milk (including the 85% produced in the UK, which would be unaffected) is about half the total wholesale cost of the dairy products that ARLA produces. The rest of that supposed retail price hike of 40% is either profiteering or scaremongering.

    Where is the fairness? Where is the openness? Where is the truth?

    Comment by Heather Grief — Tuesday, Nov 27, 2018 @ 17:17

Leave a comment

Also in: Politics

«
»
  • SUPPORT HOT

    HOT is run by volunteers but has overheads for hosting and web development. Support HOT!

    ADVERTISE

    Advertise your business or your event on HOT for as little as £20 per month
    Find out more…

    DONATE

    If you like HOT and want to keep it sustainable, please Donate via PayPal. It’s easy!

    VOLUNTEER

    Do you want to write, proofread, edit listings or help sell advertising? then contact us

    SUBSCRIBE
  • Subscribe to HOT